we get it... daily
January 16, 2005
Beware the "Moral" President
Something sends shivers down our spine when we see W take a "moral" stand on an issue. Translation: This decision won't be based on facts, more on the abstracted interpretation of Bush family goals mixed with some sub-set of the population's individual goals in subverting the intellectual and financial evolution of our country. In short, W is saying: I'm not smart enough to really think this one through on it's own merits.
Case in point; Bush recently said he has a moral obligation to "fix" Social Security. This is of course the prelude to sending millions of people into the stocks and bonds arena to manage their future retirement funds. Whoa boy - that's going to destroy the lottery-playing lower-middle class faster than you can say junk-bonds! But the idea that this is a moral necessity, one that is by the way estimated to involve transition costs of $1 trillion to $2 trillion (Can you say run-away deficit spending? We knew you could.) is absurd beyond belief.
Leave fixing things to the next president, hopefully someone who can read.
|
Read the Lies
Read the Shouts
Read the Archives
Read the Static
Read the Financials